I. Relative Clauses - Part 1
There are two types of relative clauses using reflexive pronouns.
1. Non-Restrictive Clauses (Non-Defining Clauses)
For People
+ The President of the United States, who is visiting Moscow, claimed that relations between the two countries were at their best for twenty years.
NB - you cannot use that here (after a comma).
For Things
+ The intermission, which lasts for fifteen minutes, comes halfway through the film.
NB: In this type of relative clause, the information is not essential; it could be deleted without making the sentence ungrammatical and it would still be clear who or what we are talking about.
2. Restrictive Clauses (Defining Clauses)
For People
+ The man that stole my car was fined. (this is used in American and British English)
+ The man who stole my car was fined. (this is used in British English)
For Things
+ The company which made it has gone bankrupt.
+ The company that made it has gone bankrupt.
NB: In this type of relative clause, the information is essential; if it is deleted,then the sentence will no longer make sense as we will not understand who or what is being talked about.
II. Relative Clauses - Part 2
1. Showing Possession
To show possession, we use whose for both people and things:
+ The man whose car was stolen wasn't insured.
+ The house whose basement was flooded is being repaired.
2. Omitting the Relative Pronoun in Restrictive Clauses
In the following examples, the man is the subject of both verbs and cannot be omitted:
+ The man who told me is coming later.
+ The man that told me is coming later.
In the following examples, the woman is the object of the verb "saw" and, therefore the pronoun can be omitted:
+ The woman who I saw is coming later.
+ The woman whom I saw is coming later.
+ The woman that I saw is coming later.
+ The woman I saw is coming later.
NB - WHOM is an object pronoun. It is used in formal English after a preposition and can be used to replace an object,although many no longer do this. In a phrase like "To whom it may concern", who would not be acceptable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment